Comments on: On the campaign trail

By: Big Boys Oven

Big Boys Oven — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 04:02:05 +0000

well printers make all to money! lol!

By: ParisB

ParisB — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 02:04:44 +0000

Andie: Yes yes pollution which will be around for weeks after. rinnah: Ah! Therein lies the money factor! Although the opposition might be playing a sympathy game? Its politics after all! Pablo: You have a point! GT: But the govt has never been environmentally friendly. Loads of paper wastage - see govt departments. LB: ROFLOL! You are absolutely right!

By: LB

LB — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:16:09 +0000

The PakCik was being ‘swayed’, no doubt…

By: Giddy Tigress

Giddy Tigress — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:24:37 +0000

I totally agree with you! What a waste of paper! And to think we are all supposed to be pro-save-the-environment!
Hey, that bottom pic is a bit twilight-zonish, eh?

By: pablopabla

pablopabla — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:32:54 +0000

And so…I decide to support non-BN parties. Why? Because they have lesser posters (actually that’s due to their having less funds). LOL!

By: rinnah

rinnah — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:26:01 +0000

I get annoyed about the waste of natural resources that went into printing all the flags – within a day or two, they are torn / dirty / lying on the ground. It’s such a waste of money too!

Also I don’t like the vast difference between our political parties’ election spending power that is reflected in the number of decorations. My residential area is filled with blue flags and maybe just a white flag or two.

By: andie summerkiss

andie summerkiss — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:14:26 +0000

I strongly disapprove of campaign related marketing materials too. It is a pollution, both to the environment and eyesight, don’t you think?

They are politicians, I guess there’s nothing more important than winning. Revolting, huh.